Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Further Welfare Changes Slipped In

Under the cover of the confidence and supply agreement with Act yesterday further changes to the welfare system that go beyond changes already announced by John Key and Paula Bennett prior to the election.

Namely, National and ACT intend to implement recommendations 27, 28, 30 and 34 of the Welfare Working Group report.

These proposals include:

- Employment services will be based on ‘contestable, outcome based contracts’, with contractors incentivised to ‘achieve positive outcomes for those with greatest risk of long-term dependency.’

- If parents on welfare fail to meet certain parenting obligations, or can’t manage their budget to the point that children are ‘at risk’, their income will be compulsorily managed by a third party, not themselves.

- Income management may be provided by way of a ‘payment card’ programmed for use only on items the Government considers essential.




Sue Bradford of Auckland Action Against Poverty commented :

‘National and ACT clearly see the solution to unemployment as a business opportunity rather than as an economic problem to which Government should be applying positive solutions, such as full wage job creation schemes doing socially and environmentally useful work.


‘Contracting out assistance for the unemployed has been a disastrous failure in the UK and it will be the same here. If we follow the same pattern as they have we will see jobseekers being forced to work for nothing for large companies like supermarkets that should be paying proper wages.


‘The main reason beneficiaries struggle to raise their children is that Work & Income does not provide enough money to live on.


‘Widening state – or other provider – control to the point where people have no choice or self-determination left in their lives will not magically solve this problem.


‘We can expect to see some very dodgy organisations to suddenly appear to cash in on this golden opportunity to get rich at the expense of a very vulnerable group of New Zealanders.’

LINK
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1112/S00051/the-unemployed-as-just-another-business-opportunity.htm

1 comment:

  1. You should put it Joyce changing the structure of the Auckland council in order to prevent them from building railways instead of roads. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10770953

    ReplyDelete